WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Attorney General Todd Blanche rejected Dana Bash’s suggestion that President Trump might be preparing to overturn the midterm elections.
  • The exchange concerned a Department of Justice lawsuit over the Alaska Senate race and Trump’s claims that Democrats were trying to steal the seat.
  • Blanche called Bash’s premise “crazy” and said she was “not being a real person.”
  • Blanche denied that the Department of Justice was laying groundwork for Trump to overturn an election result.

Attorney General Todd Blanche sharply rejected CNN anchor Dana Bash’s suggestion that President Donald Trump might be preparing to overturn the midterm elections, calling the premise of her question “crazy” during a Sunday appearance on “State of the Union.”

The tense exchange came as Blanche and Bash discussed the Department of Justice suing over the Alaska Senate race. Bash pressed the attorney general about Trump’s public comments concerning that contest.

Bash pointed to a Truth Social post in which Trump said Democrats were attempting to steal an important Republican seat. She argued that the president’s wording showed that political considerations were involved in the dispute.

Referencing the post, Bash said, “He’s admitting it’s political. Do you see your job as helping Republicans keep the seat?”

Blanche immediately rejected Bash’s interpretation of the president’s remarks. He challenged her assumption that a president raising concerns about what is happening with ballots must necessarily be acting for political reasons.

“He’s not admitting it’s political. Wait, you’re saying that a president’s saying that there’s something improper happening at the ballots is necessarily political? He’s the executive. He’s supposed to make sure that there is everything in this country is running right,” Blanche said.

Bash then moved beyond the Alaska Senate race and raised a broader scenario involving the midterm elections. Her question suggested Trump could be laying the foundation to challenge election results in Alaska or elsewhere.

“Let’s just talk turkey. Because one of the big questions is whether or not the president is laying the groundwork for a scenario where — whether it’s Alaska or somewhere else — there is, in your words a couple of days ago, a ‘doomsday scenario,’ and we could be in a situation where President Trump tries to overturn the election. And the result of that could be, God forbid, what we saw after January 6,” Bash said.

Do you think Elon Musk should purchase Facebook?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Conservative Mix, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

That escalation drew an immediate and blunt response from the attorney general. Blanche told Bash to stop and said she was not acting like a real person by asking the question.

“Oh, stop it! You’ve gotta stop it with that! You are not being a real person! Come on man, That is crazy!” Blanche said.

Blanche then returned the discussion to the Department of Justice’s stated concern about the Alaska contest. He said the department believes an “absolute fraud” is occurring there and that Trump wants action taken.

“Because the Department of Justice is concerned that there is an absolute fraud happening in Alaska, and he wants to do something about it, you’re saying, ‘Mr. Attorney General, because a president of the United States wants to stop a fraud and confusion in Alaska, is he going to do something crazy? That is not a real question,” Blanche said.

Bash did not retreat from the premise after Blanche’s criticism. She responded that she wished the situation were not possible and again suggested the administration might be laying groundwork to overturn an election Trump does not like.

“I wish it wasn’t. If you’re laying the groundwork for the president to try to overturn an election that he doesn’t like,” Bash said.

Blanche again denied that the Department of Justice was establishing any such foundation for Trump. He also directly challenged the truth of the premise underlying Bash’s question.

“We’re not laying any groundwork for the president to do that. So your premise — your question — is not true!” Blanche said.

The interview ended that portion of the discussion with the two sides plainly divided over the basis of Bash’s questioning. Bash portrayed the Alaska dispute as potentially connected to a future effort to overturn an election, while Blanche repeatedly said that characterization was false.

Blanche’s answers remained focused on the Department of Justice’s concern about alleged fraud and confusion in Alaska. Bash, meanwhile, continued pressing a hypothetical in which Trump might challenge an election result, prompting Blanche’s sharp rebuke on CNN.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Conservative Mix. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.