CNN host Jake Tapper put House Democrats on the spot Tuesday over an awkward omission in their midterm pitch: They have not offered voters a cohesive plan explaining how they would legislate if they capture the House majority, as reported by Breitbart.

During CNN’s “The Lead,” Tapper raised the issue while speaking with Rep. Don Davis of North Carolina. His question focused not merely on what Democrats oppose, but what they would make their first legislative priority if voters handed them control of the chamber.

Tapper said, “So, House Democrats, as a whole, have not presented any sort of cohesive plan for how you guys are going to legislate if you do win the House, which many people think is likely to happen.”

The CNN host then pushed Davis to identify the first item Democrats would pursue. He also pointed to the practical obstacle awaiting any Democratic House agenda, namely that President Trump would have to sign legislation into law or veto it.

Tapper continued, “What would you say is priority number one, legislatively? What’s the plan to get it done, knowing that you’re going to have to have President Trump either veto it or sign it into law? What’s number one?”

Davis answered by turning to the economic concerns he said he has heard from both Republicans and Democrats. He identified affordability, costs, and survival as the issues emerging in those conversations.

“What I’ve been beginning to hear on all sides, whether they be Republicans or Democrats, affordability, costs, and as I said, survival,” Davis said.

The North Carolina Democrat offered family farmers as an example of the people confronting those pressures. He specifically described the uncertainty facing a farmer whose family has worked the land for seven generations and who now wonders whether the farm can continue.

Davis said, “If you are a seventh-generation farmer and you are wondering right now if you can keep that farm, that family farm going, that’s what this is about. And we cannot lose focus.”

His response called for members arriving in the 120th Congress to concentrate on reducing the costs burdening Americans. Davis said that lawmakers should remain tightly focused on that concern rather than allowing other matters to distract them.

“We should, everyone, show up in the 120th Congress, laser-focused on helping to address costs,” Davis said. “These are the concerns I’m hearing.”

Davis said those concerns are coming from farmers and commercial fishermen. He also singled out the high price of fuel as an immediate issue that lawmakers need to address.

“I hear it from our farmers. I hear it from commercial fishermen. Right now, the price of fuel is so high,” Davis said.

He argued that elected officials must respond to the matters occupying the minds of the American people. His answer placed the emphasis on costs and the economic survival concerns he said constituents have been raising.

“And we have to make sure that we are addressing the issues that are on the minds of the American people,” Davis said.

Davis also warned against politicians talking about those concerns only during election season and then pursuing something different once in office. He said such conduct would fail the families those politicians were elected to represent.

“And if we’re just saying this around election time, and then typical politicians show up and do anything else, then we’re doing a disservice to the families that we are elected to serve,” Davis said.

The exchange left Tapper’s central observation intact: House Democrats, as a group, had not presented a cohesive legislative plan for a potential majority.

Davis identified affordability and costs as the priority he was hearing, but Tapper’s broader question concerned what the party would do and how it would get that agenda enacted.

That distinction made the moment particularly pointed. Democrats may have a list of voter concerns, but Tapper asked for a concrete legislative priority and a plan capable of navigating a White House where President Trump could either approve or reject their bills.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Conservative Mix. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.