WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
  • Martha MacCallum challenged Abdul El-Sayed over his Soros family connections and campaign rhetoric about removing money from politics.
  • El-Sayed said individual contributions differ from corporate money and defended accepting support from wealthy donors.
  • Jeffrey Soros hosted El-Sayed at a Los Angeles fundraiser last month, according to footage reviewed by Fox News Digital.
  • El-Sayed also faced questions about the $30 million pledged by the Senate Majority PAC to support his election effort.

Far-left Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed faced an uncomfortable line of questioning Monday afternoon when FOX News anchor Martha MacCallum confronted him about his connections to billionaire Democratic donor George Soros and members of the Soros family.

The exchange unfolded on “The Story,” where MacCallum pressed El-Sayed on the glaring tension between his campaign rhetoric about removing money from politics and his willingness to accept financial support from wealthy individuals aligned with Democrats.

El-Sayed has criticized Republican opponent Mike Rogers for accepting money from corporations. Yet when MacCallum raised questions about El-Sayed’s own relationships with wealthy donors, the Michigan Democratic Senate nominee insisted that his situation was not comparable.

“There’s a big difference there,” El-Sayed said during the exclusive interview Monday. That distinction became the core of his defense as MacCallum challenged him to explain why some sources of major political support apparently remain acceptable to his campaign.

El-Sayed’s graduate education was partially funded through the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans. George Soros’ wealthy nephew, Jeffrey Soros, also hosted El-Sayed at a Los Angeles fundraiser last month, according to footage reviewed by Fox News Digital.

Those connections drew scrutiny because El-Sayed is campaigning on a pledge to get “money out of politics.” MacCallum asked whether his relationships with wealthy donors undermined the very message he has been promoting to Michigan voters.

“When individuals want to give to my campaign, I welcome their support,” El-Sayed said while defending his relationship with the Soros family. His answer attempted to draw a bright line between contributions from individual donors and financial support connected to corporations or political organizations.

El-Sayed then offered a more detailed explanation of where he claims that line belongs. “You know what I don’t do? I don’t call corporations. I don’t call AIPAC… Individuals who want to support a campaign, that’s different.”

Do you think Elon Musk should purchase Facebook?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Conservative Mix, occasional offers from our partners and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and legal statement.

WATCH:

That defense allowed El-Sayed to continue arguing against corporate money while welcoming individual support, even when the individuals happen to belong to one of the wealthiest and most politically connected families supporting Democratic causes. MacCallum’s questioning kept the focus squarely on that distinction.

The interview also moved beyond El-Sayed’s personal relationships with wealthy donors. He was challenged about the $30 million pledged by the Senate Majority PAC to assist his effort to win the Michigan Senate race.

That substantial pledge created another awkward test for a campaign built around complaints about money influencing politics. El-Sayed’s argument rested on separating the kinds of support he welcomes from the corporate funding he condemns when discussing Rogers.

MacCallum did not allow the campaign slogan to pass without scrutiny. Instead, she confronted El-Sayed with the financial backing, donor relationships and Soros family connections that complicate his effort to present himself as an opponent of big money in politics.

The appearance highlighted a familiar Democratic maneuver: denounce wealthy influence when it benefits Republicans, then create a carefully worded exception when wealthy liberal donors open their checkbooks. El-Sayed’s answer was that individual support is simply different from corporate support.

Still, the questions remained centered on whether voters should accept that distinction when a billionaire family connection, a Los Angeles fundraiser and a $30 million Senate Majority PAC pledge are all part of the broader political picture surrounding his campaign.

El-Sayed entered the interview ready to criticize the financial support behind his Republican opponent. He left having to defend why his own campaign’s wealthy supporters and outside assistance should be viewed under a separate and more favorable standard.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Conservative Mix. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.